Franchising Business ? this the answer

Affordable Foodcart Franchise Business Available Nationwide!!!


Mall Cart Package Worth P75,000

Inclusion:
#Food Cart
#Equipment
#Sample Products
#Crew Uniform
#Crew Training
#Free Seminar for the owner
#Accidental Insurance
#Free Eloading Business All in One

Inquiry May Contact this #
09083386232

Photo below are all came from : or even click this and like its fanpage ( https://www.facebook.com/pages/Filtrep-Franchising/150694611749001/

 for more details please contact this facebook accounts if you are interested:

https://www.facebook.com/jobert.montellano?fref=ts

March 2013 LET results now OUT

The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) has released the results of the March 2013 Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET).

10,310 elementary teachers out of 37,117 examinees (27.78%) and 15,223 secondary teachers out of 38,433 examinees (39.61%) successfully passed the LET.

View the complete list of passers below.

March 2013 LET Results - Elementary

March 2013 LET Results - Secondary

March 2013 LET Results - Top 10 passers (Elementary)

March 2013 LET Results - Top 10 passers (Secondary)

Imahe o Rebulto?

Pagkakaiba ng ginagawa ng mga INC at Katoliko sa imahen at rebulto

Nakakatuwa at para bagang gustong palabasin ng mga katoliko na "kinakain namin ang sarili naming suka" dahil sa ang doktrina ng INC na makikita sa banal na kasulatan ay ganito:

"Huwag kang sasamba sa ibang diyos, maliban sa akin. Huwag kang gagawa ng imahen ng anumang nilalang na nasa langit, nasa lupa, o nasa tubig upang sambahin. Huwag mo silang yuyukuran ni sasambahin sapagkat akong si Yahweh na iyong Diyos ay mapanibughuing Diyos. " Exodus 20:4-5 (ABMBB)

Tapos, gumawa naman daw ng rebulto ni Ka Felix Manalo ang INC samantalang laging binabatikos ng Iglesia ang mga imahen/rebulto sa Iglesia Katolika. May pagkakaiba nga ba ang PAGGAMIT ng INC sa mga larawan/rebulto sa INC at sa mga larawan/rebulto sa Iglesia Katolika? Meron ba o wala o parehas lang sila ng PAGGAMIT SA MGA ITO?

Ito ang sagot: NAPAKALAKI NG PAGKAKAIBA NG "USAGE" ng sa INC at ng sa Iglesia Katolika, hindi lang isa o dalawa, kundi MARAMI, ANO ANO BA ITO?

Pero bago yan, ibibigay ko muna ang pagkakatulad ng GAMIT ng mga larawan/rebulto sa INC, sa Iglesia Katolika at ang mga pangkaraniwan at pampublikong larawan/rebulto katulad ng rebulto ni Dr. Jose Rizal:

- Upang ALALAHANIN ang tao sa larawan/rebulto.
- Upang bigyang PAGKILALA ang tao sa larawan/rebuto sa kanyang mga nagawa at kontribusyon.


PAGKAKAIBA:

- Hindi namin NILULUHURAN ang mga larawan/rebuto.
- Hindi namin DINADALANGINAN ang mga larawan/rebulto.
- Hindi namin ginagawang TAGAPAMAGITAN SA AMA ang mga larawan/rebulto.
- Hindi namin PINAGTITIRIK ng KANDILA ang mga larawan/rebulto.
- Hindi namin HINAHALIKAN at HINIHIPO habang nagdadasal o kaya naman sabay magsisign of the cross sa mga larawan/rebulto.
- Hindi namin iniisip na ito ay NAKAKAGAWA NG MGA HIMALA at mga extraordinaryong mga bagay.
-Hindi namin ito pinupunasan ng twalya o bimpo o panyo at ipunas sa parte ng katawan namin na may sakit upang GUMALING.
- Hindi namin ito PINAGPUPRUSISYON.
- Hindi namin inaalayan ng mga pagkain at kung anu-ano. (puwera bulaklak)
- Hindi kami nag aalay ng isang araw upang gawing PIYESTA at ipaghanda ang larawan/rebulto.
- Hindi kami bumibili ng larawan/rebulto ni Ka Felix sa mga tindahan upang ipandisplay habang nakalagay sa sariling ALTAR.
- at pinaka importante sa lahat, HINDI NAMIN ITO GINAGAWANG PARANG DYOS (pinaglilingkuran at sinasamba DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY).

Masyado bang kaunti ang mga pagkakaiba ng mga imahen/rebulto sa INC sa imahen/rebulto sa Iglesia Katolika? ANG KONTI BA???^^

Maraming bible verse ang makakapagpatunay na IPINAGBABAWAL ngang talaga ng ating Panginoong Diyos ang paggawa ng imahen/larawan. Ngunit hindi lang basta basta ganun, kundi yung gagawin mong PARANG DYOS, hindi man ituring na DYOS MISMO, kundi PINAPARANG DYOS.

Wala naman masama kung tutuusin ang PAGGAMIT ng mga ito ng Iglesia Katolika, dahil tulad ng sa Katesismo nila na sinasabing ito (daw) ay para lamang GUNITAIN o ALALAHANIN at bigyang PAGKILALA ang mga santo upang maging halimbawa sa mga tao, ang kaso, dinagdagan nila ng ibat ibang "practice" sa loob ng simbahan nila kung kaya itoy naging masama.

Sana wag naman masyado nagagalit samin ang mga Katoliko, kung magbabasa man kami sa BIBLIYA ng mga verses na nagsasabing BAWAL nga ang ginagawa nyo, CONCERN lang naman kami dahil ayaw namin kayoy mapahamak, hindi po ito PAGPAPAPOGI o PAGPAPAHIYA sa inyong paniniwala, may kaniya kaniya tayong paniniwala, ang kaso hindi lahat ng paniniwala ay TAMA at sukat IKALIGTAS, kabaligtaran pa nga dahil sa halip na kaligtasan ang inyong tamuhin ay KAPAHAMAKAN PA. Pero kahit ganoon nga, may kalayaan tayo sa paniniwala, kung napagpasyahan nyo sa sarili nyo na kahit narinig nyo na ang mga KAUTUSAN sa bibliya ay gusto nyo pa rin ituloy ang paniniwala at tradisyon nyo wala na po kaming magagawa, ang kaligtasan is a matter of CHOICE, sabi nga sa bibliya:

"Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live! Deu. 30:19

At sana rin po ay wag kayong masyadong magalit kung binabatikos man namin ang inyong paniniwala ukol sa imahen/rebulto sa mga simbahan sa Iglesia Katolika, kasi kung tutuusin, kung titignan natin ang history, hindi naman kami ANG NAUNA dyan, kundi mismong Emperador ng Byzantine Empire, kung saan nagkaroon ng Iconoclastic period noon pang 730-787 A.D kung saan inalis at pinagtatanggal ang mga imahen/rebulto at striktong pinagbawal ang "veneration and worship of saints" na ginagawa ng mga katoliko ngayon.

Ito ang description at nakalagay mismo sa monumento ni Ka Felix Manalo na makikita sa Central Complex na ngayon ay tinatawag ng "FYM MEMORIAL": "Ang Kahalalan ng Sugo ay LAGI NATING ALALAHANIN, ngunit ang LARAWAN AT SYA ay HUWANG SASAMBAHIN."

Oh ayan, malinaw na, hindi pala ginawa ang rebulto ni Ka Felix upang SAMBAHIN, hindi katulad ng mga imahen/rebulto ng mga santo at ni Kristo(daw) na PINAPARANG DIYOS nila.http://readmeiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2012/07/pagkakaiba-ng-ginagawa-ng-mga-inc-at.html

Dapat tama? Iglesia Katolika o Iglesia Ni Kristo?

Religious intolerance sa TV?

May nabasa ako ngayon sa internet tungkol sa mga ministro sa Iglesia ni Cristo, sa kanilang pangangaral sa telebisyon, eto po:

"Do Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) TV preachers realize that they humiliate and insult Catholics with their full-blast demolition job, by interpreting and inferring “falsehoods” of many principal Catholic beliefs and practices? (This is done without the full benefit of explanations and clarifications by a competent Catholic authority present). 

Why are the INC TV preachers obsessed with anti-Catholic talk day in, day out? 

Is the destruction of Catholicism an integral part of INC evangelization to promote INC membership growth, INC members’ righteousness and exclusive salvation? 

Can’t the INC preachers sermonize their sola scriptura beliefs for their own exclusive holiness and spirituality, without having to defame Catholics? 

Is the intent of the INC the proclamation and recognition of the INC (established by the patriarch of the Manalo family in 1914) as the only sacred, righteous, invincible and infallible church to the eternal damnation of all other Christian religions? 

Don’t INC TV anti-Catholic diatribes render obsolete Jesus Christ’s sermon on the mount; e.g. “Blessed are the peacemaker… the merciful… those who suffer for righteousness sake”?

Why do INC TV preachers disregard the constitutional provisions that different religious beliefs must be respected and tolerated? 

Granted that INC TV preachers talk in eloquent Tagalog and do not fulminate, still their trajectory of insult and humiliation is obvious. And they say the greatest commandment is love? 

Perhaps it’s time for INC leaders to undergo soul searching to reconsider their uncharitable treatment of Catholics on TV. The crying need in our country is for all segments of society to work in a concentrated effort for peace and unity. The same is true in our globalized world bedeviled by wars of aggression and terrorism traceable to religious fanaticism.
 
Interfaith dialogue
Ex-British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who got involved in the immoral Iraq invasion, understood the role of religion in solving racial and cultural conflicts during the pacification process. He organized the Tony Blair Foundation “to rescue faith from irrelevance caused by widespread secularism and bloodstain secularism.” The foundation aims to activate interfaith dialogue and communal action using multi-denominational networks of churches and its capabilities as service points. 

Last October, Pope Benedict XVI joined Buddhist monks, Islamic scholars, Hindus and some agnostics in making a communal call for peace insisting “that religion must never be used as a pretext for war on terrorism.” 

During the event Buddhist monks, priests and patriarchs committed themselves to working for dialogue, justice and peace for a more equitable and friendly world. 

On Nov. 12, 2011 at the Vatican City, a delegation of Muslim, Christian, Jewish and Druse religious leaders in Israel met with Pope Benedict XVI in a well-publicized effort to promote interfaith and peace initiatives in the region. 

Pope Benedict XVI has long been promoting interfaith dialogue. He urged the council of religious leaders gathered in Rome to continue working together to “foster a climate of trust and dialogue among all leaders in the region.” 

The principles on ecumenism admonish Catholic priests and lay leaders to have frequent prayers of unity as the soul of “spiritual ecumenism, and that this prayer of unity is reflective of the prayer, that they may all be one.” 

The use of TV by Catholics in the Philippines is confined to telecasts of masses on Sundays and other feasts. The purpose is to allow the sick and those who are confined in homes, hospitals and safe houses to participate in the rituals of the mass. 

Catholic priests as a rule use the pulpit for the sole purpose of illuminating the lessons in the gospel, out of respect for the spirit of ecumenism. 

Many Catholics have observed that INC members in their neighborhood or workplace are friendly, industrious, unassuming, non-confrontational and peaceful persons.

Perhaps the INC TV preachers can change their acts to adopt a more humble and charitable style. The world will be a better place if all religious leaders have the humility and generosity to honor the spirit of ecumenism rather than harbor doctrinal enmity. 

Jesus Christ taught us to pray by addressing God as “Our Father who art in heaven…” Isn’t this a clear advocacy that we must all live in harmony and solidarity as children of God? C’mon, pinagpipitaganan naming kapatid, Eduardo Manalo, please request your TV preachers to stop rocking the boat. Aren’t we all brothers in Christ? When it comes to our eternal destiny, we are all in the same boat. 

source: inquirer.net

Etong obserbasyon na ito ay ang matagal ng hinaing ng mga Katoliko, sabi nila, bakit yung mga ministro nyo araw at gabi tinitira ang simbahan namin? Hindi ba pwedeng magfocus na lang kayo sa pangangaral nyo ng sarili nyong doktrina? 

(Ang mga susunod ko pong mga pahayag ay opinyon ko lang as an INC member, bilang pagpapatunay na rin na kahit kailan sa pagboblog ko ay hindi ako bias.)

Dati, nung mabata bata pa ko, sa Pasugo at sa TV, napapansin ko nga ang ganoon, ang pag eexpose ng mga maling doktrina ng Iglesia Katolika, pero para sakin ay okay lang yon kasi para sakin wala namang masama doon.

Pero ngayon, yung medyo naging open minded na ko, yung medyo lumawak na ang aking kaalaman tungkol sa ibat ibang relihiyon pati na sa relihiyon ko ay hindi ko sinasantabi ang sinasabi ng mga Katoliko. I must say, may point naman sila.

Kaya nga pag may mga pagkakataon na nagtuturo ang ministro o guro sa pagsamba ng kabataan tungkol sa mga maling doktrina ng Iglesia Katolika ay parang medyo napapailing ako pag naaalala ko ang tungkol sa sinasabi ng mga Katoliko.

Para sakin, kung may mali man talaga sa mga ministro sa TV ay hindi yung ginagawa nilang pag eexpose ng mga maling doktrina, kundi yung pag memention nila ng pangalan ng relihiyon.

Example:

"Ang Iglesia Katolika ay nagtuturo ng aral ng demonyo na binabanggit sa bibliya"
vs.
"May ibang relihiyon na nagtuturo ng aral ng demonyo na binabanggit sa bibliya"

Malaki ang kaibahan, di ba? Pero kahit nagpaparinig lang, masakit pa rin sa mga myembro na nakakapanood dahil tinatamaan sila, pero kung ikukumpara naman sa pagmemention ng pangalan ng religion, mas okay naman ito.

Napansin ko lang, simula noong maupo si Ka Eduardo Manalo sa pagiging Executive Minister, hindi na ako nakakabasa sa Pasugo ng mga articles tungkol sa pag eexpose ng doctrines and practices ng ibang pananampalataya, kung meron man, sobrang dalang. Ang mga lagi kong nababasa ay tungkol sa mga balita sa pagbili ng INC ng mga properties abroad, sa pastoral visitations niya at iba pa... Maganda itong senyales lalo na sa kapwa ko mga INC na may parehas ding pananaw sakin, at pati na rin sa mga di kaanib na nagsusuri sa INC.

Ano pa? 

Napansin ko rin na ganun ang nangyari sa mga texto na itinuturo sa pagsamba. Dati kasi, may pag eexpose din ng mga maling pananampalataya ng iba o kaya naman ay pagpapaliwanag ukol sa pananampalataya ng INC halimbawa tungkol sa John 1:1 at iba pa. Ang mga texto sa pagsamba ngayon ay tungkol sa moralidad at pagbabagong buhay.

Ano pa?

Ang pagtalakay ng mga maling doktrina ng ibang pananampalataya ay hindi na mapapanood sa kung saan saang programa ng INC, sa programang "Ang pagbubunyag" na lang natin ito naririnig at napapanood.

Napansin nyo rin ba ang mga yon?

Siguro, hindi man ako sigurado, na isusunod na rin ng Ka Eduardo ang paraan ng pag eevangelize sa TV, siguroy alam ng tagapamahalang pangkalahatan ang tungkol sa mga bagay na ito kaya ganoon.

Ako rin, last last year lang, narealize ko dapat sa pagboblog ko ay hindi ako masyadong "hot na hot" dapat cool lang ako palagi kahit na maraming kumakaaway sakin dahil lang Iglesia ni Cristo ako. Siguro ngay panahon na para ibahin na nating mga INC members ang paraan ng pakikiargumento o pakikipagdebate sa mga di kaanib sa mga forums, blogs, websites at iba pa. Siguroy dapat maging sobrang cool lang tayo, wag masyado maging defensive yun bang nagsabi lang ng ganito pero ang reply natin sobra sobra naman, yung ganun^^

Hindi kasi tayo makakapag invite ng mga tao para magsuri sa Iglesia ni Cristo kung ang makikita nila satin ay halimbawa, nagsasabi ng di kaaya ayang salita o kung ano pa man. Yung sa blog ko naman, inaayos ko na paunti unti, ineedit ko na lalo na sa 2014, maraming magsesearch sa Iglesia ni Cristo sa internet, kelangan kong maghanda!^^ Lalo na tayo, dahil para tayong nasa digmaan non, pag nagsulputan na ang mga balita worldwide tungkol sa celebration natin, alam nyo na, ang mga inggit sa INC ay gagawa ng mga dirty tactics para siraan ang INC sa iba...


Paano pala kung sadya yon?

Naisip ko rin, paano pala kung sadya ang ginagawa ng mga ministro sa kanilang pangangaral sa TV? Ang ibig kong sabihin, meron silang malalim na dahilan kung bakit palagiang ineexpose ang mga maling aral ng Iglesia Katolika?

Dapat kasi nating malaman at ikonsider, na ang growth ng INC noong panahon ni Ka Felix ay dahil sa mga religious rallies at debates kung saan laging ineexpose ang mga maling doktrina hindi lang ng Iglesia Katolika kundi na rin ng mga Protestante. Ito ang naging susi ng INC, sa aking obserbasyon, para marami ang maanib at makaalam ng katotohanan.

Kung ganoon naman pala, kung eto pala kumbaga ang style o paraan ng INC, bakit nito babaguhin ang pangangaral sa TV?

Isa pang nakikita kong dahilan, kung sadya man talaga ito, ay dahil na rin sa doktrina ng INC.

Eto ang tinutukoy ko:

"Fear not for I am with you; I will bring your descendants from the east, And gather you from the west;  I will say to the north, 'Give them up!' And to the south, 'Do not keep them back!'  Bring My sons from afar. And My daughters from the ends of the earth."  Isa. 43:5-6

Diba ang "north" na binabanggit ayon sa turo ng INC ay ang mga Protestante, at ang "south" naman ay ang Iglesia Katolika?

Ano pa?

"Calling a bird of prey from the east. The man who executes My counsel, from a far country. Indeed I have spoken it; I will also bring it to pass. I have purposed it; I will also do it" Isa. 46:11

Di bat si Ka Felix ang tinutukoy sa hulang ito? Siya ang aagaw ng mga tao sa kamay ng dalawang malaking relihiyon na ito?

Ano pa?

Di bat kaming mga Iglesia ni Cristo ay naniniwala na ang Iglesia Katolika sa pasimula ay ang Iglesia ni Cristo? Ibig sabihin, ang tunay na Iglesiang itinatag ni Kristo noong unang siglo ay Iglesia ni Cristo, ngunit sa paglipas ng maraming taon ay binago nila ang pangalan at tinawag na "Iglesia Katolika".

Kung ganito naman pala, na kaya siguro binabanggit ang pangalan ng Iglesia Katolika at mga Protestante sa pag eexpose ng kanilang mga maling aral ng mga ministro ng Iglesia n i Cristo sa TV ay dahil ay may koneksyon ito sa aming doktrina.

Itatanong ng ilan, bakit lagi nyo na lang "tinitira" ang Iglesia Katolika?

Balikan natin ang aral ng Iglesia ni Cristo. Sa amin kasi, naapostatized ang Iglesia ni Cristo noong unang siglo na kalaunay tinawag na Iglesia Katolika, dahil dito ayon na rin sa propesiya sa bibliya, lilitaw ang Iglesia ni Cristo sa mga wakas ng lupa.

Kung ang Iglesia Katolika pala dati ay siyang Iglesia ni Kristo, na itinayo ni Kristo, hindi ba mabuti kung mapanunumbalik ng mga ministro ang mga tao sa TUNAY NA PANANAMPALATAYA? sa TUNAY NA RELIHIYON?

Ayon na rin sa bibliya:

"Then I heard another voice from heaven say, “Come out of that city, my people, so that you will not share in her sins. Then you will not suffer any of the terrible punishment she will get." Rev. 18:4

Kung ang mga ministro ay sumisigaw (not literal) sa mga Katoliko para umalis sa Iglesia Katolika para di sila masama sa mga kasalanan nito (Stolen Babies, Inquisition, Priests scandals, Friar's abuse of power and etc.) at sa kakaharapin nitong kaparusahan, masama ba yon?

At kung utos din naman sa bibliya ang pag eexpose ng mga maling aral:

"Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." Eph. 5:11

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." II ti. 3:16-17

Kung naniniwala kami na mali ang mga itinuturo ng Iglesia Katolika at mga Protestante, ayon sa bibliya, mali ba na iexpose ng mga ministro ang mga iyon?

Kung ang Jehovas witnesses o Church of Jesus Christ the Latter Day Saints ang ieexpose ng madalas, ito ang matatawag na UNFAIR, dahil wala namang koneksyon ang INC dito o hindi naman kasama ang mga ito sa doktrina ng INC kung saan ito ay naapostatized o kung ano pa man, hindi katulad ng Protestante lalo na ng Iglesia Katolika.

Baka matanong din ng ilan, bakit ba kasi ang hilig nyong mag expose ng paniniwala ng iba?

Ayon na rin sa doktrina ng INC, alam ko namang alam nyo rin yon, na naniniwala kami na ITO LANG, at wala ng iba, ang tunay na Iglesiang dapat aniban ng tao. Hindi kami protestante, na kung mapapansin nyo sa LIGHT TV CHANNEL 33, ibat ibang relihiyon nagsasama at hindi sila nagsisiraan o nag eexpose ng kani kanilang paniniwala. Kung wala kaming doktrina na "ONLY TRUE CHURCH" ay wala kaming dahilan para talakayin ang ibat ibang paniniwala. Pero dahil nga sa doktrina namin yon, at bilang pagsunod na rin sa bibliya na iexpose daw ang mga mali sa pamamagitan ng bibliya, masama po ba iyon? 

At dahil nga sa may doktrina kami tungkol sa ONLY TRUE CHURCH, ano po ba ang gusto at ineexpect nyong gawin ng mga ministro ng INC sa TV? Ipromote ang doctrines and practices ng ibang relihiyon? Suportahan ang ibang relihiyon at iencourage ang mga tao na sa kanila umanib?


Bakit naman ang Iglesia ni Cristo lang ang sinasabihan niyo?

Nakakapagtaka naman, dahil kung tutuusin, halos 2 relihiyon lang naman ang madalas na binabanggit ng Iglesia ni Cristo sa mga programa nito, ang Iglesia Katolika at Protestante.

Kung ikukumpara naman sa mga Iglesiang binabanggit sa programa ni Mr. Soriano, halos lahat ng kilalang relihiyon sa Pilipinas at abroad ay tinitira niya sa kaniyang programa DAY AND NIGHT! Paano ba naman, yung programa niyang ITANONG MO KAY SORIANO na recorded at nirereplay na lang eh nag aair kahit gabing gabi na, at umaga rin nagsisimula.

Eh yung D'XMAN nila? programa rin nila EXCLUSIVELY para sa INC? Hindi ba religious intolerance yon? Yung programa ng INC na "Ang mga nag sialis sa samahang Ang Dating Daan" ay matagal nang hindi nag aair, ganun kabuti ang INC, ginawa ito para hindi na lumala ang alitan sa pagitan ng INC at ADD ni Mr. Soriano.

Bakit hindi nyo rin sabihan ang CBCP sa kanilang mga interview tungkol sa RH Bill at pagboto tuwing eleksyon, bakit nila dinadawit ang pangalan ng Iglesia ni Cristo? 


http://readmeiglesianicristo.blogspot.com/2013/02/religious-intolerance-sa-tv.html 

whats new for Abs-cbn news reporter Alex Santos

Ax falls on ‘news managing’ ABS-CBN reporter

By spinadmin 04/07/2013

 

Where in the world is Alex Santos?

ABS-CBN’s top reporter for kidnapping incidents has been conspicuously absent in the network’s news and public affairs programs. No longer is he seen in Umagang Kay Ganda and TV Patrol, much to the delight, we heard, of Jorge Cariño, the lone ABS-CBN reporter who could rival Santos in the category of good looks.

But let it be clear that Cariño had nothing to do with Santos’ disappearance. And no, our guy wasn’t kidnapped. He actually quit before the network could formally boot him out last February.

This was what happened.

Santos had a scoop — guess what — about a missing boy. He covered the story and was all set for the evening’s newscast.  But then came a piece of good news. The victim had been recovered and Santos had been told about it.

The logical thing to do was to update the story, but Santos had something else in mind. He went ahead with the original story — the poor child was still missing — and was “saving” the update for another day. In short, the viewers were served a “partially truthful” story courtesy of the Alex Santos School of News Management.

The story was so heart-breaking that it hit the core of TV Patrol anchor and ex-Vice President Noli De Castro’s humanity. De Castro ended up bantering at length about the unfortunate incident during the primetime newscast. And it didn’t stop there.

The following morning in his radio program, De Castro tackled the story further and interviewed a local official. That’s when the truth exploded in the face of poor Kabayan — the victim had been found!
Embarrassed before his legions of fans, De Castro stormed the newsroom afterward and demanded an investigation. Santos’ cameraman wilted under pressure and spilled the beans on his “enterprising” reporter. The cameraman had apparently been instructed by Santos not to surrender the CF card containing additional footage on the crucial development in the story.

Santos’ “news management” busted, ABS-CBN soon came out with the verdict: FIRE HIM! Before the ax could actually fall, Santos left quietly, a disgraced journo who had suddenly gone jobless.
Last we heard, he’s knocking on the door of a cable TV-based news network whose main viewers are relatives of its pretty but largely clueless reporters.

We do hope the sun eventually shines in this dark episode in Santos’ career. In the meantime, we’re left with his chief ABS-CBN rival, the dashing, spotless and erudite Jorge Cariño, who’s busy with his orbit around local officials for the network’s special pre-election series.

Pope Francis names first appointee in PH

ABS-CBNnews.com

Posted at 04/08/2013 6:57 PM | Updated as of 04/09/2013 2:55 AM

MOST REV. REYNALDO G. EVANGELISTA, D.D., Bishop of Boac

MANILA - Pope Francis has named his first appointee in the Catholic hierarchy in the Philippines, a CBCP News report said.
Boac Bishop Reynaldo Evangelista was named the bishop of the Diocese of Imus, which was left vacant by Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle.
The 52-year-old native of Batangas is a member of the Permanent Council of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), the report said.
He is also the chief of the CBCP Commission on Vocations and a member of the Commission on Seminaries.
The Imus diocese covers the entire province of Cavite. It is, however, a “suffragan” of Tagle’s now Archdiocese of Manila.
A suffragan is an “assistant” to the main bishop.

LP bet in Marinduque disqualified

Repost from Philippine Daily Inquirer

Comelec division rules Reyes heiress lied about citizenship, residency

By Jonas Cabiles Soltes, Tina G. Santos

Inquirer Southern Luzon

10:27 pm | Thursday, April 4th, 2013

 

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has disqualified from running for a House seat an heiress of a powerful political clan in Marinduque, an administration candidate, for false statements about her citizenship and residency in her certificate of candidacy (COC).
In a 12-page resolution dated March 27, the Comelec First Division, led by Presiding Commissioner Lucenito Tagle, canceled the COC of Regina Ongsiako Reyes, daughter of Marinduque Gov. Carmencita Reyes.
The division ruled on a petition filed by Joseph Socorro Tan, a registered voter of Torrijos, Marinduque, who asked the Comelec to disqualify Regina, saying her candidacy is a violation of the Constitution and the Omnibus Election Code.
Tan alleged that Reyes lied in her COC about her age, civil status, residence and citizenship.
The division ruling, however, focused only on two aspects of the case—Regina’s citizenship and her residency.
 
Not married
In her reply to Comelec, Regina said Tan simply based his allegation about her residency on a theory that she is married to Rep. Herminaldo Mandanas, who lives in Batangas.
Regina said while she is publicly known as Mandanas’ wife, she is not married to the congressman.
Regina also said there is no evidence showing that she is a permanent resident or citizen of the United States.
In the petition, Tan said Reyes acquired US citizenship in 2005 and was issued a US passport.
Tan submitted pieces of evidence, including an article in the Internet that came out on Jan. 8 providing a record from the US immigration bureau showing that Regina is a US citizen.
Tan also submitted Regina’s travel records that showed her using a US passport.
The Comelec division said, however, that there is no evidence that Regina had renounced her US citizenship and taken an oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines.
“There is no showing that the respondent complied with the … requirements (of reacquiring Philippine citizenship),” said the Comelec resolution.
Burden of proof
It said the burden of proof has shifted to Regina. “This the respondent utterly failed to do so, leading to the conclusion inevitable that respondent falsely misrepresented in her COC that she is a natural-born Filipino citizen,” said the resolution.
“She remains to be an American citizen and is therefore ineligible to run for and hold any public office in the Philippines,” it said.
The Comelec division added that since there is no proof that Reyes had renounced her American citizenship, it follows that she has not abandoned her domicile of choice in States.
The division said the only proof that Regina presented to show that she has met the one-year residency requirement and that she never abandoned her residency in Boac is her claim that she served as provincial administrator of the province from Jan. 18 to July 13, 2011.
“But such fact alone is not sufficient to prove her one-year residency,” said the resolution.
It said citizenship is an indispensable requirement for anyone seeking public office in the Philippines.
“It is a requisite which should be dealt with more scrutiny, if only to ensure that no person owing allegiance to another nation is actually permitted to govern our people,” it said.

Congressional candidate in marinduque disqualified

REPOST http://www.mb.com.ph/article.php?aid=6261&sid=1&subid=5&fb_action_ids=4636633396902&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582#.UV48_0qq8gs

 

By Raymund F. Antonio

Published: April 5, 2013

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has disqualified Regina Reyes, daughter of Marinduque Governor Carmencita Reyes, from running as congresswoman in next month’s midterm elections.
Reyes is running as representative of the lone congressional district in Marinduque.
In its 13-page decision, the Comelec First Division ruled that Reyes is not eligible to run for public office in the province for being an American citizen.
The ineligible candidate was declared as such also for her failure to meet the one-year residency requirement for candidates.
“Thus, a Filipino citizen who becomes naturalized elsewhere effectively abandons his domicile of origin,” the Comelec said in a resolution signed by Commissioners Lucenito Tagle and Christian Robert Lim of the First Division.
“In this case, there is no showing whatsoever that respondent (Reyes) had already re-acquired her Filipino citizenship… so as to conclude that she has regained her domicile in the Philippines. There being no proof that respondent had renounced her American citizenship, it follows that she has not abandoned her domicile of choice in the United States of America,” the poll body stressed.
The Comelec ruled that the American citizenship of Reyes was evident based on her previous travels to the US from October 14, 2005 to June 30 2012, using her United States passport No. 306278853.
The Comelec decision stemmed from the petition filed by Joseph Tan, a resident of Torrijos, Marinduque, to cancel Reyes’ certificate of candidacy for making several false representations in her COC.
Tan claimed that Reyes stated in her COC that she was born June 3, l964, when some pertinent records showed that her date of birth was July 8, 1959, while others stated that she was born on July 3, 1960.
The petitioner added that Reyes failed to renounce her American citizenship.
He said Reyes violated Section 6, Article VI of the Constitution and Section 74 of the Omnibus Election Code (OEC) since a candidate seeking for a congressional post must be a natural-born Filipino citizen.

He pointed out that “Reyes did not apply for dual citizenship, and even if she did, there is no record that she renounced her US citizenship.”
The Liberal Party fielded Reyes as its candidate for representative of Marinduque against incumbent congressman Lord Allan Jay Velasco of National Unity Party. She is the daughter of Marinduque Gov. Carmencita Reyes and sister of Toll Regulatory Board Executive Director Edmundo Reyes, Jr.

Comelec disqualifies Marinduque congress bet

repost from

 

 

Published on 04 April 2013

Written by Jomar Canlas Senior Reporter 

In a ruling dated March 27, the Comelec First Division held that Reyes is a US citizen and is therefore disqualified from running for a seat in the House of Representatives in the May 13 elections.

The case stemmed from a petition filed by Joseph Tan to deny due course to or cancel Reyes’ certificate of candidacy on the basis of several false representations made by Reyes in her certificate of candidacy.

The petition stated that Reyes, daughter of Marinduque Governor Carmencita Reyes and sister of Toll Regulatory Board Executive Director Edmundo Reyes, Jr., intentionally withheld the fact that she is single, a natural-born Filipino citizen, and a resident of Boac, Marinduque, but who carries a US passport.

Reyes was supposed to face Marinduque Rep. Lord Allan Velasco, who defeated her brother Edmundo during the May 2010 polls.

In its decision, the poll body pointed out that Reyes is a US citizen and relied on the certificate issued by the Bureau of Immigration detailing Reyes’ use of a US passport since 2005.

“Unless and until she can establish that she had availed of the privileges of RA 9225 by becoming a dual Filipino-American citizen, and thereafter, made a valid sworn renunciation of her American citizenship, she remains to be an American citizen and is, therefore, ineligible to run for and hold any elective public office in the Philippines,” the Comelec ruling said.

The poll body further stated that “the requirement of Philippine citizenship is indispensable for a person seeking for an elective public office…It is a requisite which should be dealt with more scrutiny, if only to ensure that no person owing allegiance to other nation is actually permitted to govern our people.”

Sources from the Comelec say that when the finality of the ruling is rendered, all votes for Reyes will be deemed as stray votes or will not be counted by the PCOS machines.

Binibining Pilipinas Candidate #9 Katherine Anne Enriquez

Jomar Enlighten Sesame

Sunday 

Binibining Pilipinas Candidate #9 Katherine Anne Enriquez

Tag PhotoAdd LocationEdit

Like ·  ·  · Share · Edit

• Mayet Linga Galo and Chie Licon Sesame like this.
• 1 share
• 

  Jomar Enlighten Sesame Si Katherine Anne Enriquez ay anak daw mandin ni Benchito Enriquez na taga Tiguion, Gasan, Marinduque.

  Sunday at 6:08pm · Like

"Nuwebe" a Joseph Israel Laban film shot in Marinduque

"NUWEBE" filmed in the island of Marinduque

 The much-awaited, most-celebrated and most popular indie film festival in the Philippines is CINEMALAYA Philippine Independent Film Festival 2013.

In the New Breed Category, the film, “NUWEBE” has been included. “Nuwebe” is written and directed by Joseph Israel Laban of Boac, Marinduque. 

Inspired by the actual story of one of the youngest mothers in Philippine history, “Nuwebe” follows the story of Krista who at the tender age of 9 got pregnant from the sexual abuse perpetrated by her own father… 

Behind the scene.

Krista's story is complex. She refuses to see herself as a victim. With an almost documentary style, “Nuwebe” (Siyam) follows Krista’s story as she demonstrates a level of resilience uncommon to her age.  Her mother on the other hand is torn between her love for her child and her love for her husband.

With the Boac River as setting.

“Nuwebe” stars  Nadine Samonte, Jake Cuenca, Anita Linda, Manny Castañeda, Mikael Liwag, and Barbara Miguel.

“Nuwebe” was filmed in the island of Marinduque. Showing from July 26 to August 4, 2013, in CCP Theaters, Trinoma and Greenbelt Cinemas.

Director Laban and actor Jake Cuenca.

Actress Nadine Samonte.

http://networkedblogs.com/JR0Fw